| To: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 May 2003 01:33:59 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | muizelaar@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030527095129.4bddbc51.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3ECEB317.5020407@xxxxxxxx> <20030525.192417.102551586.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030527095129.4bddbc51.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 09:51:29 -0700 There needs to be some locking in the registration path doesn't there to prevent two calls to register the same name and other possible conflicts. So do you want to use dev_base lock or some other locking? Good point. We can't be as "fast and loose" with this as we can with the hotplug invocation... I can't come up with a usable solution at this moment. :( |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] remove sdla from setup.c, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |