| To: | Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Layer-7 Filter for Linux QoS] |
| From: | Ethan Sommer <sommere@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 May 2003 10:42:40 -0500 |
| Cc: | Martin Josefsson <gandalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, biondi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030521075617.N43477@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1053313298.3909.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030519202756.I39498@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3EC9B815.4000504@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20030520080940.E40885@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3ECA3E2C.20805@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20030520105356.U41173@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1053443703.17386.138.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030521075617.N43477@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030515 Thunderbird/0.1a |
Jamal Hadi wrote: I think you should do some measurements - "it doesnt slow 100Mbps" and "lets worry about it when we get to 1 or 10Gbps" are handwaving at best. Infact i would strongly recommend looking at the libqpsearch above. Agreed. However, libqpsearch doesn't do regex yet, so we can't use it. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Jamal Hadi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Layer-7 Filter for Linux QoS], Ethan Sommer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Layer-7 Filter for Linux QoS], Jamal Hadi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Layer-7 Filter for Linux QoS], Ethan Sommer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |