netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean?

To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean?
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 14:08:36 -0300
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030521.020242.16237776.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Conectiva S.A.
References: <20030520162906.GF801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030521.015317.125867074.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030520165831.GG801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030521.020242.16237776.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Em Wed, May 21, 2003 at 02:02:42AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ 
escreveu:
> In article <20030520165831.GG801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 20 May 2003 
> 13:58:31 -0300), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
> 
> > > I don't think so.  Above modification will break current 
> > > reasonable bind(2) behavior.
> > > 
> > > Well, it would be dead code, which would be used for (still 
> > > unsupported) SO_REUSEPORT.
> > 
> > So just delete the test?
> 
> Hmm, (bacause I want to remember this path in the code,) how about #if 0 ?
> David?

Sounds good to me.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>