Re: simple change to qdisc

netdev

Re: simple change to qdisc_restart()

To:	Eric.Lemoine@xxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: simple change to qdisc_restart()
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2003 01:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20030520082217.GC978@udine>
References:	<20030520082217.GC978@udine>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

   From: Eric Lemoine <Eric.Lemoine@xxxxxxx>
   Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 10:22:17 +0200
   
   Any comments regarding the following patch?

I understand why it is valid, etc., but why do we even want to do
this?  It is not like this dead-loop detection stuff is a hot-path or
anything like that.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
simple change to qdisc_restart(), Eric Lemoine Re: simple change to qdisc_restart(), David S. Miller <= Re: simple change to qdisc_restart(), Eric Lemoine Re: simple change to qdisc_restart(), Robert Olsson Re: simple change to qdisc_restart(), Eric Lemoine Re: simple change to qdisc_restart(), Eric Lemoine Re: simple change to qdisc_restart(), Robert Olsson Re: simple change to qdisc_restart(), Jamal Hadi Re: simple change to qdisc_restart(), Eric Lemoine

Previous by Date:	simple change to qdisc_restart(), Eric Lemoine
Next by Date:	Re: simple change to qdisc_restart(), Eric Lemoine
Previous by Thread:	simple change to qdisc_restart(), Eric Lemoine
Next by Thread:	Re: simple change to qdisc_restart(), Eric Lemoine
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]