| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 May 2003 21:23:08 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030519.181405.35017608.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.51.0305191408490.1795@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030519154852.I39024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030520011053.GB10419@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030519.181405.35017608.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 19 May 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > I bet you have been, the weakness in the hash has been very well > publicized and the script kiddies aren't using the truly random > version of the attacks anymore. Just google for juno-z.101f.c, this > (or some derivative) is the DoS people attack program are actually > using. Also used to attack CISCOs by them kiddies btw. We stand much better than any CISCO doing caching. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |