| To: | Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 May 2003 18:10:53 -0700 |
| Cc: | "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030519154852.I39024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <87d6iit4g7.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030517.150933.74723581.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <87iss87gqd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030518.023151.77034834.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030519132819.S38814@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0305191408490.1795@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030519154852.I39024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 06:37:43PM -0400, Jamal Hadi wrote: > cache bucket distribution. This was a major problem before. Was the hash distribution broken before even in the truly random case? If so, the patch would likely help. If not, it shouldn't really affect the DoS case or the normal traffic case, because I doubt we have been the target of any hashing-specific attacks. I've been looking through the patch and there seem to be quite a few changes, including some that may optimize it. I'm about to test it out on a test machine and do some benchmarks. I'll post my results in the next day or so. Thanks, Simon- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Layer-7 Filter for Linux QoS], Jamal Hadi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Jamal Hadi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |