netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: acenic lockup

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: acenic lockup
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 13:27:35 -0400
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, anton@xxxxxxxxx, jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030508.090954.94579344.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; from davem@xxxxxxxxxx on Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:09:54AM -0700
References: <200305072221.CAA00973@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030508.090049.48375778.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030508131135.G22565@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030508.090954.94579344.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:09:54AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx>
>    Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 13:11:35 -0400
>    
>    P.S. Can you please email @pobox.com for stuff that is not Red Hat
>    specific?
>    
> My apologies, I will do this in the future.
> 
> How much will this affect latency though? :-)

Should improve it :)  I didn't check my redhat.com email all weekend
this past weekend, for example.

        Jeff




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>