| To: | rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: dev->destructor |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 06 May 2003 20:58:18 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030507035148.2C97F2C0C4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030506.072338.39479306.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030507035148.2C97F2C0C4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 12:50:07 +1000 But that's a sideshow: you'd *still* want an extra refcount around the call to module_init(). ... Now, grabbing a similar reference when deleting a module might make sense, but it's actually kinda pointless when you look at the code. Indeed, forget my idea ;-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: dev->destructor, Rusty Russell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] net/socket: fix bug in sys_accept, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: dev->destructor, Rusty Russell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: dev->destructor, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |