| To: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: purpose of the skb head pool |
| From: | Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 01 May 2003 12:38:38 +0200 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <16046.30879.738356.495523@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (Robert Olsson's message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:05:35 +0200") |
| References: | <20030429135506.A22411@xxxxxx> <16046.30879.738356.495523@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.09002 (Oort Gnus v0.20) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > 2.6.66 IP. Forwarding of two input simplex flows. eth0->eth1, eth2->eth3 > Fixed affinity CPU0: eth0, eth3. CPU1: eth1, eth2. Which common for routing > and should be "worst case" for other use. The test should give a very high > load on the packet memory system. As seen at least we don't see any > improvement from skb_head_pool code. > > > Vanilla 2.5.66 381 kpps > Magazine 431 kpps > Magazine + no skb_head_pool 435 kpps Can you rerun this test with random source/destination addresses, to get more realistic (for some configurations) numbers? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] af_pppox: create module infrastructure for protocol modules, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: purpose of the skb head pool, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] af_pppox: create module infrastructure for protocol modules, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: purpose of the skb head pool, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |