Re: [BK ChangeSet@xxxxxxxxxx] new module infrastructure for net_proto_family

[Max Krasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 08:29 PM 4/23/2003, David S. Miller wrote:
>   From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:41:56 -0700
>
>   At 04:30 PM 4/23/2003, David S. Miller wrote:
>   >Your stuff was unacceptable from the start because you didn't put
>   >the ->owner into the protocol ops.
>   But you didn't tell me that. You just said that it's "an ugly hack" without
>   giving any other feedback.
>    
>As you mention, Rusty said this.
>
>   What about this though
>   
>I'm sure Arnaldo will deal with the sys_accept() issues.
>But this is a minor issue, Arnaldo's stuff is architectually
>solid.

:) 

Ok Dave. I'm not sure why you're _completely_ ignoring my arguments.
You should have just said from the beginning that you were going to
ignore what I have to say regarding that issue. At least I wouldn't 
have wasted my time.

Sorry for bugging you.
Max