| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: How to enable more than ~256 routing tables? |
| From: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2003 00:45:39 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <20030422.161645.80924947.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Candela Technologies |
| References: | <3EA4EAFD.5020808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030422.161645.80924947.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 |
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? wrote: In article <3EA4EAFD.5020808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 22 Apr 2003 00:10:53 -0700), Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:Is it possible to just change the RT_TABLE_MAX to be higher and have 256-???? be more /* User defined values */ ? Thanks for the response...but I was definately hoping for some better news! I'm guesing that to change this would mean at least a recompile of the user-space 'ip' utility, (and who knows what else!) Why o why did someone think that 256 was all anyone would ever want! Think we could at least increase this to 16 bits for 2.5? Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: How to enable more than ~256 routing tables?, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ip_gre.c:ipgre_tunnel_xmit() duplicated code ?, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: How to enable more than ~256 routing tables?, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [BK ChangeSet@xxxxxxxxxx] new module infrastructure for net_proto_family, Max Krasnyansky |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |