| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] take2: new module infrastructure for net_proto_family |
| From: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:10:08 -0300 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030420160218.GB8399@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Conectiva S.A. |
| References: | <20030419233408.GG6251@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030419.184122.74731778.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030420160218.GB8399@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
Em Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 01:02:18PM -0300, Arnaldo C. Melo escreveu: > Em Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 06:41:22PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: > > Note that, eventually we'll need to handle the struct sock side of this > > equation. Consider that struct sock's can exist long after the user struct > > socket is closed (TCP is the best example), yet they reference internals to > > the protocol module (via sk and skb callbacks, hash table linkage, etc.). > > humm, I'll work on this later today, tweaking sk_alloc/sk_free. as net_families is static in net/socket.c we'll need npf_get and npf_put (net proto family get/put), is the naming OK for you? > > We can deal with this later, let's merge your stuff in first. > > Thanks, now to easter lunch :-) > > - Arnaldo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] take2: new module infrastructure for net_proto_family, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [2.4.20] Frustrating DNS / UDP Socket flakeyness, Mark Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] take2: new module infrastructure for net_proto_family, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] take2: new module infrastructure for net_proto_family, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |