Re: snmp stats as %ld or %lu

netdev

Re: snmp stats as %ld or %lu

To:	rddunlap@xxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: snmp stats as %ld or %lu
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 03 Apr 2003 04:48:22 -0800 (PST)
Cc:	linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20030402122755.5dc3f022.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
References:	<20030402122755.5dc3f022.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

   From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
   Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:27:55 +0000

   ipv4/proc.c prints SNMP stats using %lu,
   but ipv6/proc.c prints them using %ld.

   Is this difference intentional, planned, or an oversight,
   or something else?

Looks like an oversight to me, both should use the unsigned format.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
snmp stats as %ld or %lu, Randy.Dunlap Re: snmp stats as %ld or %lu, David S. Miller <= [PATCH] snmp6 stats as %lu, Randy.Dunlap Re: [PATCH] snmp6 stats as %lu, David S. Miller

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	[PATCH] linux/net.h: bye bye struct net_proto, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Previous by Thread:	snmp stats as %ld or %lu, Randy.Dunlap
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] snmp6 stats as %lu, Randy.Dunlap
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]