Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II

netdev

Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II

To:	davem@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II
From:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 02 Apr 2003 13:20:34 +0900 (JST)
Cc:	toml@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20030401.200225.88014087.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization:	USAGI Project
References:	<20030401.193429.64279267.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030402.130232.78951283.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030401.200225.88014087.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

In article <20030401.200225.88014087.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 01 Apr 2003 
20:02:25 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> I just checked, nobody cares about the 8 bytes in enc_data.
> 
> Therefore, I think you're idea of enc_data[0] is the best.
> 
> Someone please double check my claims and submit a patch. :-)

Okay, I'll check it (and make a patch) in this afternoon 
(in a few hours).

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, Tom Lendacky Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <= Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, Tom Lendacky Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, David S. Miller

Previous by Date:	Re: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes], Jason Lunz
Next by Date:	RE: Intel 1000 MT slow to restart, Hen, Shmulik
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, Tom Lendacky
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]