[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 21:49:35 +0900 (JST)
Cc: kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kunihiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030222.031326.103246837.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20030222202623.38d41d8a.kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030222.031326.103246837.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

In article <20030222.031326.103246837.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 22 Feb 2003 
03:13:26 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> Nothing in xfrm routines really need to reference ipv6 module
> functions, please eliminate this dependency.  Breaking ipv6 as module
> is ok for temporary development, but eventually it must be solved.

xfrm_policy.c:xfrm6_bundle_create() seems to depend on ip6_route_output()
as xfrm_bundle_create() depends on __ip_route_output_key().
How do we solve this dependency? inter-module?

Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>