Re: [PATCH] Fix to avoid overriding TCP/UDP with a new protocol of same

netdev

Re: [PATCH] Fix to avoid overriding TCP/UDP with a new protocol of same

To:	sri@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Fix to avoid overriding TCP/UDP with a new protocol of same type.
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Cc:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0302191603540.1590-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0302191603540.1590-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

   From: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:14:48 -0800 (PST)

   I think i found a bug in inet_register_protosw() which results in a
   behavior that is not expected.
   
Thanks Sridhar, this looks like a good fix.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] Fix to avoid overriding TCP/UDP with a new protocol of same type., Sridhar Samudrala Re: [PATCH] Fix to avoid overriding TCP/UDP with a new protocol of same type., David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	[PATCH] Fix to avoid overriding TCP/UDP with a new protocol of same type., Sridhar Samudrala
Next by Date:	Re: [Lksctp-developers] Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553, Jon Grimm
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] Fix to avoid overriding TCP/UDP with a new protocol of same type., Sridhar Samudrala
Next by Thread:	connecting ipv6 nodes throu' ipv4 network ...., santosh kumar gowda
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]