| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] LSM networking update: summary (0/5) |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 8 Feb 2003 20:43:55 +1100 (EST) |
| Cc: | Makan.Pourzandi@xxxxxxxxxxx, <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030208.004440.91323755.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:10:44 +1100 (EST) > > As mentioned during the last week, the current set of network hooks will > not directly support explicitly labeled networking. > > Why not? I thought we had completely established that anything > the socket receive SKB hook could not handle would be implementable > via netfilter. > By not directly supported, I mean by the LSM network hooks. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: skb_padto and small fragmented transmits, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | liquido urgente por viaje, Alejandro - No responder aqui |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] LSM networking update: summary (0/5), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] LSM networking update: summary (0/5), David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |