netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] LSM networking update: summary (0/5)

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM networking update: summary (0/5)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:44:40 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Makan.Pourzandi@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302081002400.9462-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7B2A7784F4B7F0409947481F3F3FEF8305CC9531@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302081002400.9462-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:10:44 +1100 (EST)
   
   As mentioned during the last week, the current set of network hooks will
   not directly support explicitly labeled networking.

Why not?  I thought we had completely established that anything
the socket receive SKB hook could not handle would be implementable
via netfilter.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] LSM networking update: summary (0/5), David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: skb_padto and small fragmented transmits, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  RE: [PATCH] LSM networking update: summary (0/5), James Morris
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] LSM networking update: summary (0/5), James Morris
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]