| To: | Jason Lunz <lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why was the /proc info removed from e1000 ? |
| From: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:51:06 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <slrnb3ikqi.i0h.lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Candela Technologies |
| References: | <3E388D19.4000004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <slrnb3ikqi.i0h.lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 |
Jason Lunz wrote: greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:I just noticed in the latest changelog that the /proc support was removed from the e1000 driver? I always found this usefull...any reason why it was deleted?shortly lower in the changelog, you'll see that the same stats are now availble using the standard ethtool interface. I don't know whether you need a new ethtool to make sense of the e1000 stats struct. Jason It was nice to not have to have to dredge up the latest ethtool binary in order to see the pretty stats. However, I am glad to see more stuff supported by the ethtool interface. Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why was the /proc info removed from e1000 ?, Jason Lunz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] LSM networking: introduction (0/8), James Morris |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why was the /proc info removed from e1000 ?, Jason Lunz |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Why was the /proc info removed from e1000 ?, Feldman, Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |