| To: | Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size) |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:49:28 -0500 |
| Cc: | alan@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030117172719.GA31343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030117145357.GA1139@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030117160840.GR12676@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030117162818.GA1074@xxxxxxx> <20030117172719.GA31343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 05:27:19PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:28:18AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > The reason why the patch was not accepted is that it changes one magic > > number to another magic number, and without chipset docs, I had no idea > > what either magic number really meant. > > Whilst on the subject of magic numbers in net drivers, did we ever get > to the bottom of 2.4's ChangeSet 1.587.9.20 > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davej/patches/2.5/2.5.48/split-dj1/net-cs89x0-media-corrections.diff IIRC it came from -ac tree without explanation, and I think akpm said it broke stuff. Since it has an alive maintainer (akpm), I would rather let Alan and Andrew fight it out :) Whatever they decide is fine with me for 2.5. Jeff |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size, Ducrot Bruno |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size, Florian Lohoff |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size, Dave Jones |
| Next by Thread: | Re: cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size), Alan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |