| To: | chengjin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Cheng Jin) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: snd_cwnd drawn and quartered |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Jan 2003 05:12:11 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | wa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33L0.0301131752020.26396-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Cheng Jin" at Jan 13, 3 05:58:07 pm |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > I am not sure what you mean here, slow start takes much faster to > transmit 100 pkts than 100 RTTs. Maybe there is a misunderstanding here, > when cwnd=1 in congestion recovery, it will stay at 1 until it exits > recovery unless some packet times out first. I see! Seems, you spotted a real problem. I missed this. I feel we should add a trigger stopping such "fast" :-) restransmit when cwnd falls low. Maybe, the same <cwnd/4 is good criterium. I need to think, the situation is really weird. Could you, please, prepare a demo pseudo-tcpdump with your simulator? > just curious if people can come up with better ways to set cwnd. Come up! :-) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: snd_cwnd drawn and quartered, Cheng Jin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: snd_cwnd drawn and quartered, Cheng Jin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: snd_cwnd drawn and quartered, Cheng Jin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: snd_cwnd drawn and quartered, Cheng Jin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |