| To: | ak@xxxxxxx (Andi Kleen) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support. |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:25:44 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | jgrimm2@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, sri@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030113210708.GA328@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Andi Kleen" at Jan 13, 3 10:07:08 pm |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > So in short clearing DF is near always a bug these days. Exactly. And it is exactly why I said that this compromises all the pmtu discvoery and why I would like people consulted SCTP designers before doing this step. I cannot believe that new protocol was designed in this way. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support., Nivedita Singhvi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support., Sridhar Samudrala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support., Nivedita Singhvi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support., Jon Grimm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |