netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support.

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: jgrimm2@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support.
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 15:45:16 -0800 (PST)
Cc: sri@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3E1CAACB.5D1B82DB@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0301081451110.2281-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030108.150638.09647984.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3E1CAACB.5D1B82DB@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: Jon Grimm <jgrimm2@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 16:48:43 -0600
   
   IIRC, this is what OpenSS7s SCTP does, while the KAME SCTP manually
   controls the DF bit as per Sridhar's suggestion.   There are tradeoffs
   in either approach.

Then the decision is currently up to you :-)
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support., Jon Grimm
Next by Date:  Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support., Nivedita Singhvi
Previous by Thread:  Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support., Jon Grimm
Next by Thread:  Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support., Nivedita Singhvi
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]