| To: | Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Maciej Soltysiak <solt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [OT] Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs |
| From: | Andrew McGregor <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 09 Jan 2003 09:39:15 +1300 |
| Cc: | Wichert Akkerman <wichert@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.51.0301082129180.12716@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301082122190.32244-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0301082129180.12716@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Probably not slow and/or overloaded. I'd think it's more likely that it
has a routing update problem or an unreliable link. But whatever, this
seemed to me to be a classic 'dodgy box in the middle' rather than an end
host problem.
Andrew--On Wednesday, January 08, 2003 21:31:04 +0100 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Definitly it is somehow unstable. Difficult to find the reason. Anyway Im sure that there is asimmetric routing between me and ipv6.lkml.org and I could see pkts coming back. It might not have been the case for Wichert Fabio On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:> Probably on the server's side it got an ICMP Host Unreachable or two as > some router updated its tables, and decided to close the connection. Sounds reasonable to me. Could it mean that this router that we are talking about is simply slow or overloaded ? Maciej |
| Previous by Date: | [OT] Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Wichert Akkerman |
| Previous by Thread: | [OT] Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Wichert Akkerman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |