| To: | Maciej Soltysiak <solt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs |
| From: | Wichert Akkerman <wichert@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:43:47 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301081718340.4542-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Maciej Soltysiak <solt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20030108150201.GA30490@xxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301081718340.4542-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
Previously Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > I do not know how many tunnels are in my path, i know that hop distance to > my tunnel is exactly 1 hop (ipv6 broker and ipv4 provider are the same) My tunnel provider is 5 hops away. To my knowledge non of the ipv4 or ipv6 hops in the path are congested and no traffic shaping is done. > If there is immense traffic at one of the routers (total traffic on an > interface) stream packets can be simply dropped if there are no queuing > disciplines that would take eg. flow control into account. I'll ask the ISPs involved to check if this might be happening, but I highly doubt it. > btw. what the hell is JunOs ? Juniper OS, running on Juniper routers. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <wichert@xxxxxxxxx> http://www.wiggy.net/ A random hacker |
| Previous by Date: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Maciej Soltysiak |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Wichert Akkerman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Maciej Soltysiak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Wichert Akkerman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |