netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50

To: Stefan Rompf <srompf@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 19:52:57 -0500
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3DED2EA9.D812C881@xxxxxx>
References: <3DE33D6D.25B9C9B4@xxxxxx> <20021126.021546.91313706.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3DED2EA9.D812C881@xxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126
Pardon my dumb question, but what parts of RFC2863 require kernel additions over and above your link state patch?

Your second patch I am less enthusiastic about than the first... :(

I wonder if userspace cannot figure out ifOperStatus from existing data we make available?

        Jeff




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>