| To: | Stefan Rompf <srompf@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Patch: Backport of link state notification to 2.4.20 |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 03 Dec 2002 19:45:27 -0500 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3DED4FB4.5070700@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3DD2D204.C9B7FA2D@xxxxxx> <3DED302A.E3DEB585@xxxxxx> <3DED4FB4.5070700@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126 |
Jeff Garzik wrote: Stefan Rompf wrote:Hi David, attached is the recent backport of link state notification for the stable kernel series. The feature is optional and can be configured away to nothing, and tested on several systems.It might be a backport, but I haven't seen a 2.5.x version posted in a while. If this is going into the stable series, it should already be merged in 2.5.x at the same time, if not first. ...and of course this email arrives immediately in my inbox ;-) Which leads to the question: why CONFIG_LINKWATCH in 2.4 but not 2.5? Let's do the same in both kernels unless there is a good reason not to... |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Patch: Backport of link state notification to 2.4.20, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Patch: Backport of link state notification to 2.4.20, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | tcp flows hash function, SVR Anand |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |