| To: | Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: O_DIRECT sockets? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 24 Oct 2002 03:46:53 -0700 |
| Cc: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>, bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200210241214.59812.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200210231218.18733.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200210231726.21135.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DB6CF9E.327E165F@xxxxxxxxxx> <200210241214.59812.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 03:14, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > I can't use sendfile(). I'm working with files > 4GB, and from man 2 sendfile: That's what sendfile64() is for. In fact every vendor I am aware of is shipping the sys_sendfile64() patch in their kernels and an appropriately fixed up glibc. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port), David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sendfile64() anyone? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?), David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: O_DIRECT sockets? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?), Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk |
| Next by Thread: | (±¤°í) Áö±ßÁö±ßÇѹ«Á»!ÀÌÁ¨ ¾È³ç~~, ¹Ù·¹¹Ì¼Ò |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |