| To: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:23:03 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021023.162439.114324450.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20021004.001929.03389091.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200210031552.TAA29921@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021023.162439.114324450.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:24:39 +0900 (JST) Well, I've refered alexey's patch and simplified many if-clauses. Here's the new patch and test results. seems ok. So, because you simplified some if clauses in Alexey's patch, USAGI is the only entity who deserves credit for the work in the comments? That's dishonest. Please fix this. |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port), Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |