| To: | <J_Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [Question] SMP for Linux |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:16:01 +0200 |
| Cc: | <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <008601c27602$a1ad8170$3701020a@CONCORDIA> |
| References: | <15790.42618.961289.506241@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <008601c27602$a1ad8170$3701020a@CONCORDIA> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Jon Fraser writes:
>
> What was your cpu utilization like in the bound vs split scenarios?
Not measured. Gonna take a look w. varient of Manfred's loadtest when
possible. But measuring the CPU this way also gives affects throughput.
Other softirq's are allowed to run as well now. :-)
Over 1 Mpps was injected into eth0 so a good assumption is that for UP
all CPU is used but with SMP we might have some...
> Does your e1000 driver have transmit interrupts enabled or disabled?
transmit?
> I'd be really interested to see the results with two flows in opposite
> directions.
Me too.
Cheers.
--ro
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Development countries. News in brief, The Financial News |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | NIC on 2.4.19 SMP, Paul Hernandez |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Question] SMP for Linux, Jon Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Question] SMP for Linux, Jon Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |