On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 05:07:06PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:28:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:10:37PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > >
> > > I will not even look at the networking LSM bits until
> > > CONFIG_SECURITY=n is available.
BTW, there's another big issues with LSM: so far all those hook
have no user in a mergeable shape. For all other additions
there is a strong need to present something mergable but LSM
doesn't. IMHO we should require a pointer to a module in mergaable
shape (i.e. certainly not selinux) for each new hook addition.
|