Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey

netdev

Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c

To:	Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 17 Oct 2002 04:50:54 +0200
Cc:	design@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200210170248.g9H2m6bf011892@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<200210170248.g9H2m6bf011892@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

> I am looking for confirmation from network stack people that my conclusions
> from reading of the macros in linux/net.h is correct.

What you should actually do is to add explicit proper SMP locking.
Then you don't need any SOCKOPS_WRAP hacks.

-Andi

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Michael Richardson Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Andi Kleen <= Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Michael Richardson

Previous by Date:	FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Michael Richardson
Next by Date:	Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Previous by Thread:	FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Michael Richardson
Next by Thread:	Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]