| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH idea - netlink and link changes |
| From: | Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:07:53 -0700 |
| Cc: | Stefan Rompf <srompf@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.30.0210120909450.23509-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020827 |
jamal wrote: On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Stefan Rompf wrote:IMHO we should merge the patches, taking your one workqueue per device approach and my usage of IFF_RUNNING as a mirror bit. What do other netdev people think?Only one work queue please, not one per device. What of two devices that lose link at the same time? Say a hub or switch dies.. -- Tim Hockin Systems Software Engineer Sun Microsystems, Linux Kernel Engineering thockin@xxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Patch: link state detection for 8139too against 2.5.41, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Patch: Idea for RFC2863 conform OperStatus, Stefan Rompf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH idea - netlink and link changes, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH idea - netlink and link changes, Stefan Rompf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |