| To: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Patch: Idea for RFC2863 conform OperStatus |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:50:53 +0200 |
| Cc: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021014111155.GB20397@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3DA82269.CBB65E89@xxxxxx> <20021014103855.GA19962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <15786.42910.601886.468716@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021014111155.GB20397@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
bert hubert writes:
> With a bgp full view? 100kpps is not all that impressive in itself isn't it?
> We benchmarked our nameserver at 120kpps recently and linux seemed
> unimpressed :-)
For me yes. :-) It connects one the major ftp sites... Box can handle 350
kpps w/o filter and connection tracking. With current traffic pattern we have
160 kpps for wire speed at GIGE.
Yes full BGP. Well even full BGP from 2 peers plus some handful prefixes from
other BGP peers.
ip route | wc -l
115670
Gated has 41 MB of BGP routes. With Zebra this would be ~75 MB.
ps aux
root 232 0.0 7.9 41392 40876 ? S Aug 15 36:54 gated
Cheers.
--ro
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Patch: Idea for RFC2863 conform OperStatus, bert hubert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Patch: Idea for RFC2863 conform OperStatus, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Patch: Idea for RFC2863 conform OperStatus, bert hubert |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] Re: Sleeping function called from illegal context at slab.c:1378 [2.2.22 fix], James Morris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |