| To: | "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@?(B" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses |
| From: | Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:00:18 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021008.000559.17528416.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 12:05:59AM +0900 |
| References: | <20021008.000559.17528416.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 12:05:59AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@?(B
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Prefix length for link-local address should be 64, not 10.
> This patch fixes prefix length of link-local address.
>
> Following patch is against 2.4.19.
Huh?
Without reading the kernel routing table code a bit more, I'm not certain
what that change does, but it looks as if it might be changing the
connected route for a link local from fe80::/10 to fe80::/64.
I'd actually say that is wrong.
All link local's are currently supposed to have those top bits
('tween 10 and 64) zero'd, however any address within the link local
prefix _is_ on link / connected and should go to the interface.
i.e. it's perfectly valid for me to assign a link local of fe80:1910::10
to an interface and expect it to be work, likewise for a packet
destined to any link local address to trigger ND.
DF
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (problem solved), Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |