[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLAN patches

To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: VLAN patches
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 19:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bjorn.Andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0210061839210.1861-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20021005.220549.15266753.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0210061839210.1861-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:47:50 -0400 (EDT)
   A packet with VLANid 0 and an 802.1p tag > 0 is legal. I
   think its known as a "priority tagged" packet (not 100% sure
   about the term). Therefore VLANid 0 MUST be accepted and ability to send
   it should be there.

Great, I stand corrected, please send me a patch which therefore
accepts VID 0 on create and destroy.

   BTW, what about VLANid 0xFFF?

Your guess is as good as mine ;-)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>