| To: | cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Chris Friesen) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH Re: udp weirdness |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:40:12 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3D99B07B.7050901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Chris Friesen" at Oct 1, 2 10:26:03 am |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > If I'm looping on a sendto() with a blocking socket, I would expect the > syscall to block until the packet has been handed off to the device > driver. This may mean blocking until local congestion backs off. Feel free to implement. :-) > The way we do it now means that we can chew up massive amounts of cpu > creating packets in userspace and throwing them away in the kernel, with > no way of knowing from userspace that it is happening. What? If your applications is enough clever to handle ENOBUFS right, set IP_RECVERR and live in peace. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH Re: udp weirdness, Chris Friesen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH Re: udp weirdness, Chris Friesen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH Re: udp weirdness, Chris Friesen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH Re: udp weirdness, Chris Friesen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |