netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PATCH Re: udp weirdness

To: <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH Re: udp weirdness
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:14:04 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Eric Lemoine <Eric.Lemoine@xxxxxxx>, Eric Lemoine <Eric.Lemoine@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200210011353.RAA19504@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Alexey,

I agree; so just ignore the patch. You know you could have saved me
about an hour if you spoke earlier ;->
Eric, note what Alexey says. So to get enobufs please
use the sockoption to set IP_RECVERR
Someone should document this in the manpages.

cheers,
jamal

On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Hello!
>
> > be propagated back to the socket level; please review and probably
> > apply:
>
> That was tried and failed miserably ages ago. Applications become
> insane when getting this error from logging tons of useless messages
> to abort()ing and cpu hogging. From the other hand silent reaction
> to loss is almost exactly desired behaviour in presence of congestion
> in the most of cases.
>
> I have no idea, why that OSes work. Probably, they are so great that
> never lose packets. We do.
>
> Probably, the world has changed since that time, but I have no desire
> to repeat the experiment to be honest.
>
> Alexey
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>