| To: | mbp@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:32:30 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Alan.Cox@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020930095909.GA8063@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200209261309.RAA17837@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020926.134608.31605412.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20020930095909.GA8063@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Martin Pool <mbp@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:59:10 +1000 On 26 Sep 2002, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dave, do you not remember this? So where does this leave us? Someone has to agree that the patch should go in. Problem is, at least two of us do not run 2.2.x at all on any of our systems (actually all of my currently powered-on machines aren't even supported in 2.2.x) which makes it hard for us to test this ourselves. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: udp weirdness, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Alan Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |