[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection

To: usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 14:14:07 +0900 (JST)
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200209280444.IAA02959@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20020928.133019.38287529.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200209280444.IAA02959@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <200209280444.IAA02959@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:44:29 
+0400 (MSD)), kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says:

> I am not sure that it is really interesting though. Just now I cannot
> imagine what user can invent which is not covered by system-wide rules,
> bind() and IP{V6}_PKTINFO. Well, if you think more hairy scheme is 
> interesting,
> feel free to implement this.

we need per application (per socket) interface
for privacy extension (public address vs temporary address) and 
mobile ip (home address vs care-of address).


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>