[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection

To: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection
From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:44:29 +0400 (MSD)
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020928.133019.38287529.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" at Sep 28, 2 01:30:19 pm
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

> we need per socket preference.

What kind of? Some matching rules loaded to socket by user?

Anyway, rules established by a particular client should be separate,
it is just a generalization of bind()/IP{V6}_PKTINFO.

I am not sure that it is really interesting though. Just now I cannot
imagine what user can invent which is not covered by system-wide rules,
bind() and IP{V6}_PKTINFO. Well, if you think more hairy scheme is interesting,
feel free to implement this.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>