| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:20:01 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200209271639.UAA21514@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20020928.011439.108856769.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200209271639.UAA21514@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:39:45 +0400 (MSD) > (do I need to resend complete patch?) No, I think. Deletion of bad debugging is easier to make after patching. I've applied the patch with the time_after() debugging check removed to both 2.4.x and 2.5.x If, after discussion, the "HZ --> HZ/2" change needs to be made, just send another patch on top of previous one, thanks. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] migrate ioctls upwards, Matthew Wilcox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Linux problems with hundreds of interfaces/routes, Petr Baudis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |