netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: mbp@xxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Alan.Cox@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200209261309.RAA17837@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020926054721.GA6039@xxxxxxxxx> <200209261309.RAA17837@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
   Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:09:11 +0400 (MSD)

   I do not understand why tcp_push_pending_frames() was not used
   there... maybe, there was some reason not to use it.
   
   Dave, do you not remember this?

I was just trying to be too clever.  That is all.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification, Roberto Nibali
Next by Date:  Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, kuznet
Next by Thread:  Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]