| To: | "Chad N. Tindel" <ctindel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:07:15 -0400 |
| Cc: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxx>, "Cureington, Tony" <tony.cureington@xxxxxx>, Pascal Brisset <pascal.brisset-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | MandrakeSoft |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.44.0209171257180.11147-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 |
Chad N. Tindel wrote: Also, a further question: do you have access to the slave struct net_device? If so, just test netif_carrier_ok(slave_dev) and avoid all that ioctl calling if it returns non-zero.Make that "avoid all that ioctl calling from interrupt context", which is a bug. Of the box-killing variety ;)Will netif_carrier_ok(slave_dev) always work? Do all drivers support the __LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER flag? No. Read again the precise language I used :) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Jay Vosburgh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Chad N. Tindel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Chad N. Tindel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |