| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload |
| From: | "Chad N. Tindel" <ctindel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:58:24 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Cureington, Tony" <tony.cureington@xxxxxx>, Pascal Brisset <pascal.brisset-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>, <bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3D878841.EB580DE9@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > Also, a further question: do you have access to the slave struct > > net_device? If so, just test netif_carrier_ok(slave_dev) and avoid all > > that ioctl calling if it returns non-zero. > > Make that "avoid all that ioctl calling from interrupt context", which > is a bug. Of the box-killing variety ;) Will netif_carrier_ok(slave_dev) always work? Do all drivers support the __LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER flag? If so, is there any reason to call the ioctl in the first place? Chad |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Manfred Spraul |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Jay Vosburgh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |