| To: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, todd-lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:52:11 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, pfeather@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209160805360.7184-100000@gp> |
| References: | <20020913.150439.27187393.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209160805360.7184-100000@gp> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: todd-lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 08:16:47 -0600 (MDT) are there any standards in progress to support this. Your question makes no sense, it is a hardware optimization of an existing standard. The chip merely is told what flows exist and it concatenates TCP data from consequetive packets for that flow if they arrive in sequence. who is working on this architecture for receives? Once cards with the feature exist, probably Alexey and myself will work on it. Basically, who ever isn't busy with something else once the technology appears. is there a beginning implementation yet of zerocopy receives No. Franks a lot, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Networking, Facey Brian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |