netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000

To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, todd-lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:12:20 -0700
Cc: tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pfeather@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209131553510.10203-100000@gp>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209131553510.10203-100000@gp>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0
Quoting todd-lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:

> dave, all,
> 
> not sure i understand what you're proposing, but while we're at it,
> why not also make the api for apps to allocate a buffer in userland
> that (for nics that support it) the nic can dma directly into?  it

I believe thats exactly what David was referring to - reverse
direction sendfile() so to speak.. 

> seems likely notification that the buffer was used would have to
> travel through the kernel, but it would be nice to save the
> interrupts altogether. 

However, I dont think what youre saving are interrupts as 
much as the extra copy, but I could be wrong..

thanks,
Nivedita




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>