| To: | ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:15:21 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, niv@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <m1d6rko9ab.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <m1hegwoppm.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <477096648.1031728254@[10.10.2.3]> <m1d6rko9ab.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 11 Sep 2002 09:06:36 -0600 "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > We can push about 420MB/s of IO out of this thing (out of that > theoretical 800Mb/s). Sounds about average for a P3. I have pushed the full 800MiB/s out of a P3 processor to memory but it was a very optimized loop. You pushed that over the PCI bus of your P3? Just to RAM doesn't count, lots of cpu's can do that. That's what makes his number interesting. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Eric W. Biederman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Eric W. Biederman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Eric W. Biederman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |