| To: | Martin.Bligh@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:48:15 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | gh@xxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, niv@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <61930391.1031313088@[10.10.2.3]> |
| References: | <20020906.113611.102227888.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <61930391.1031313088@[10.10.2.3]> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:51:29 -0700 I see no reason why turning on NAPI should make the Apache setup we have perform worse ... quite the opposite. Yes, we could use Tux, yes we'd get better results. But that's not the point ;-) Of course. I just don't want propaganda being spread that using Tux means you lose any sort of web server functionality whatsoever. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |