| To: | kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx (Krishna Kumar) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 Prefix List support for 2.5.31 |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Aug 2002 04:32:22 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <OF37F86F02.E05B3694-ON88256C23.0080D178@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Krishna Kumar" at Aug 28, 2 04:55:35 pm |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > - Routing table will have lots of address prefixes that are not available > to the local interface addresses. Well, all the direct routes are prefixes by definition. > - To be a prefix list entry, it should come via an RA. Wrong. But this does not matter, RA routes may be tagged with a flag. > - Also, the search over a longer routing table across all nodes is more > time consuming. Do you jest? You compare linear search with lookup in radix tree. :-) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 Prefix List support for 2.5.31, Krishna Kumar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | A question on RTT estimation of SACKed packet., Xiaoliang \(David\) Wei |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 Prefix List support for 2.5.31, Krishna Kumar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 Prefix List support for 2.5.31, Krishna Kumar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |